559
what would you tell week-1 you about method development
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on purity in this community changed substantially around the start of last year,…
u/teodor_szabo
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Lyon.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
6,037post karma
9,077comment karma
4submissions
98comments
Overview — page 5 of 5
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about transit time in c/intlshipping · 174 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring DHL at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/intlshipping · 80 points · 1 year ago
Australia to Australia: TFC with 13 days is the average, variance is 40
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about gradient in c/hplc · 155 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring DHL at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/intlshipping · 93 points · 1 year ago
Customs clearance time included?
comment on stalled for 24 weeks at 7.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/hplc · 66 points · 2 years ago
the detector wavelength matters more than people think
comment on week 71 check-in — 7kg down, reflux manageable, one thing confusing me in c/bpc157 · 32 points · 2 years ago
sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence
comment on anyone else notice waist kicking in around week 50 in c/dosinglogs · 39 points · 2 years ago
the boring consistency is the point
comment on anyone else notice Zepbound kicking in around week 54 in c/tirzepatide · 28 points · 2 years ago
Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply scaled versions.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about method development in c/hplc · 11 points · 2 years ago
The related substances profile is way more interesting than the main peak %. A 98% with 22 peaks is different from a 98% that is one 30% impurity.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about method development in c/hplc · 6 points · 2 years ago
This is the correct method framing. Column and gradient are load-bearing fields.
comment on tried sequence for 24 weeks. here is what happened. in c/bpc157 · 8 points · 2 years ago
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
comment on genuine question about EMS that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/intlshipping · 59 points · 2 years ago
customs clearance often adds 3 days, factor that in
comment on France: tirzepatide, and what it actually costs here in c/tirzepatide · 223 points · 2 years ago
dual agonism is SURPASS, do not generalise from semaglutide
comment on tried DHL for 3 weeks. here is what happened. in c/intlshipping · 94 points · 2 years ago
Strongly agree. Customs adds unpredictable delay.
comment on [Results] 41 weeks on 7.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/tirzepatide · 112 points · 2 years ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
3.4k
[Discussion] the SURMOUNT advice in here is 17 years out of date
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: SURMOUNT matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides…
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring Zepbound at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/tirzepatide · 195 points · 2 years ago
The SURMOUNT readouts are real but less consistent than STEP. Some people plateau earlier on tirz.
comment on [Results] 57 weeks, 20kg, and tirzepatide was the hard part in c/tirzepatide · 299 points · 2 years ago
The SURMOUNT readouts are real but less consistent than STEP. Some people plateau earlier on tirz.
comment on [Results] 91 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/hplc · 49 points · 2 years ago
a round-robin on baseline integration would be genuinely useful