u/teodor_jansen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Linköping.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Overview — page 4 of 4
comment on reading batch threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/coa · 39 points · 1 year ago
the related substances line is where the story is
comment on reading batch threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/coa · 1k points · 1 year ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
comment on [Results] 67 weeks, 21kg, and province was the hard part in c/glp1canada · 22 points · 1 year ago
no cross-border purchasing instructions
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 53 weeks to accept.
comment on three years of area percent threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 169 points · 2 years ago
the batch number or it did not happen Adding to this: COA is doing more work than the comment implies.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring COA at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 61 points · 2 years ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about related substances until somebody posts a number in c/coa · 276 points · 2 years ago
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 87 weeks to accept.
comment on small win: Canada stopped being a problem at week 61 in c/glp1canada · 10 points · 2 years ago
cross-border pricing arbitrage is formulary but risky
comment on [Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 98.0% and 97.9% in c/coa · 41 points · 2 years ago
Four months on the site and I was confusing area% and mass% in every post I made.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Meta] the below spec rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/labresults · 15 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 52 weeks to accept.
comment on [Lab] 22th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/newbiequestions · 71 points · 2 years ago
week two nothing happening — yes, that is normal
comment on stalled for 17 weeks at 2.4mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/newbiequestions · 574 points · 2 years ago
This is a good question, genuinely.
comment on does test results actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/labresults · 31 points · 2 years ago
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
comment on week one: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/newbiequestions · 1 points · 2 years ago
what is a COA — certificate of analysis, document from the lab
comment on [Results] 52 weeks, 6kg, and USDC was the hard part in c/cryptopay · 142 points · 2 years ago
escrow for group buys is standard, use it
comment on [Meta] the batch rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/coa · 1 points · 2 years ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #5 — the Netherlands, 35 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/coa · 750 points · 2 years ago
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
comment on Medutest: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/labresults · 32 points · 2 years ago
Batch number? Date of test?
comment on help me understand batch, I have read the wiki twice in c/coa · 10 points · 2 years ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on what changed for me between week 40 and week 89 in c/coa · 417 points · 2 years ago
Water content on the document? That affects your concentration math.