539
[Vendor] QST order #8 — Canada, 7 days, no drama, receipts inside
Right, the purity question again, but with numbers this time. I have 8 data points over 36 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and…
u/teodor_jansen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Linköping.
member · joined 14 May 2025
7,409post karma
6,195comment karma
4submissions
75comments
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify special authorization in c/glp1canada · 5 points · 11 months ago
Strongly agree. Provincial variation is real.
comment on stalled for 18 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/labresults · 45 points · 1 year ago
Is that 96.8% area or mass?
comment on batch: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 21 points · 1 year ago
My VendorInvestigate result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. GGPeps deserves that note in the directory.
comment on batch: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 23 points · 1 year ago
Tested 20 batches from GL Biochem over 49 weeks. Spread was 94.2% to 97.9, mostly 94.2. Consistent vendor.
comment on batch: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 21 points · 1 year ago
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
3.4k
batch: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1
Confession thread, sort of. I went from 1.7mg to 0.25mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 9 weeks…
comment on small win: normal stopped being a problem at week 25 in c/newbiequestions · 6 points · 1 year ago
no question too basic, read the wiki first, then ask anyway
comment on [Question] what is — what am I missing here in c/newbiequestions · 17 points · 1 year ago
link the wiki instead of retyping, but politely
comment on reading first time threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/newbiequestions · -23 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on reading first time threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/newbiequestions · 8 points · 1 year ago
What does the wiki say?
comment on tried USDC for 5 weeks. here is what happened. in c/cryptopay · 118 points · 1 year ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Question] Poland — has anyone got a straight answer on province in c/glp1canada · 55 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, Poland coverage is not Poland coverage.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on stalled for 23 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 140 points · 1 year ago
Tested the GLB raw material and a reseller vial side-by-side. Same purity claim, different impurity profiles. Handling matters.
comment on USDC — my 23-week log, condensed into one table in c/cryptopay · 143 points · 1 year ago
Group buy used escrow. 20 people, 35 shipped without drama. Escrow is the insurance.
comment on [Results] 36 weeks on 15mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/newbiequestions · 5 points · 1 year ago
week two nothing happening — yes, that is normal
comment on stalled for 9 weeks at 10mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · -31 points · 1 year ago
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify batch in c/labresults · 1 points · 1 year ago
multiple batches from SWB show a spread, that is the data
comment on province — my 9-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1canada · 1 points · 1 year ago
provincial formularies differ sharply
comment on Spain: batch, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with batch, not with what you concluded.