u/soren_nkemelu

WXT three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 98.3% anyway, so no harm done.

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

The COA I was holding said 96.8% area and I thought it was trash. Turns out the method was solid and the impurity profile was clean.

Yeah, that is totally normal for week 13.

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.

Small correction: the trial was 22 weeks, not 16. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

axis labels included, always

triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual

referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions

Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.

TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 99.0% weight loss but the reflux profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

axis labels included, always

How many orders from SGN is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.

order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.