u/soren_nkemelu
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Genoa.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 4 of 4
comment on Janoshik vs order records — genuinely asking which matters more in c/vendorvetting · 21 points · 1 year ago
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
comment on stalled for 23 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 76 points · 1 year ago
The COA I was holding said 96.8% area and I thought it was trash. Turns out the method was solid and the impurity profile was clean.
comment on why does nobody talk about related substances in c/coa · 54 points · 1 year ago
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify week one in c/newbiequestions · -25 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, that is totally normal for week 13.
comment on [Lab] 5th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 584 points · 1 year ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for glucagon posts in c/retatrutide · 295 points · 1 year ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on does retatrutide actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 years ago
Small correction: the trial was 22 weeks, not 16. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about related substances until somebody posts a number in c/coa · 22 points · 2 years ago
axis labels included, always
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 15 in c/retatrutide · 39 points · 2 years ago
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
comment on unpopular opinion: reship is massively overrated in c/vendorvetting · 27 points · 2 years ago
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
comment on the batch question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/coa · 382 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on week 51 check-in — 12kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 years ago
TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 99.0% weight loss but the reflux profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.
comment on is it normal to get injection-site soreness at week 29 in c/vendorvetting · 4 points · 2 years ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring water content at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 17 points · 2 years ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on genuine question about certificate of analysis that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/coa · 103 points · 2 years ago
axis labels included, always
comment on someone explain reship to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 2 years ago
How many orders from SGN is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.
comment on someone explain reship to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 2 years ago
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 1.7mg and the nausea got better, not worse in c/coa · 106 points · 2 years ago
the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing
comment on my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether Janoshik is why in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 2 years ago
GGPeps order #17, the UK, no drama, receipts inside