u/scam_taxonomy

Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.

referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions

reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations

IANAD and neither is anyone upvoting this

Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

Batch 8 appeared on QSC, GGPeps, and QSC claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.

Removed a chain here.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

multiple batches from SSA show a spread, that is the data

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body

The VendorInvestigate result at 94.2% was below the 95.1% claim. GL Biochem retested at their cost and came back 94.2%. Logged as resolved.

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

group buy exit scams follow a pattern

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.