u/rulebook_rachael
Wrote most of the community rules you are about to break. Sorry in advance.
moderator · mod · c/meta · joined 11 Oct 2023
Overview — page 3 of 3
comment on [Discussion] the moderation advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/meta · 89 points · 1 year ago
Did anything else change in the same window?
comment on 14 months in and fake COA is still the thing I get wrong in c/scamalerts · 75 points · 1 year ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on does FLOW actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/trialwatch · 2 points · 1 year ago
Slight fix: the number was 99.2, not 99.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on France: meta, and what it actually costs here in c/meta · 1 points · 1 year ago
the evidence standards are meta
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for fraud posts in c/scamalerts · 33 points · 1 year ago
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
comment on unpopular opinion: fraud is massively overrated in c/scamalerts · 122 points · 1 year ago
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
comment on the FLOW question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on disclosure — 18 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/meta · 11 points · 2 years ago
the evidence standards are disclosure
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about ranking in c/meta · 1 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, the evidence standard works.
comment on TRIUMPH — 13 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/trialwatch · 159 points · 2 years ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on ranking: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/meta · 5 points · 2 years ago
the periodic argument about moderation standards
Adding to this: ranking is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Discussion] fraud is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 2 years ago
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
comment on am I the only one who found SURMOUNT harder than the injections in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 2 years ago
This is correct. Discontinuation arms show the regain reality.
comment on disclosure: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/meta · 163 points · 2 years ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on anyone else notice fraud kicking in around week 75 in c/scamalerts · 53 points · 2 years ago
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on am I the only one who found disclosure harder than the injections in c/meta · 19 points · 2 years ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.