GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
0
c/meta·posted 2 years ago by u/katrin_marchetti

what would you tell week-1 you about ranking

Rules Cold Box ×2

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.

I have been tracking meta against eGFR for 39 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.

Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.

tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.

0 up / 0 down48% upvoted8 commentsid 94rrcw12 Feb 2024

8 comments

8 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/nora_lundgren6 points·2 years ago
ask your actual doctor, not us
replysharereportpermalink
[removed]2 points·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/nora_lundgren1 point·2 years ago

rules, moderation, ranking, wiki

replysharereportpermalink
u/rulebook_rachaelmod · c/meta1 point·2 years ago

Yeah, the evidence standard works.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_cardoso1 point·2 years ago

the wiki is the source

replysharereportpermalink
u/katrin_marchettiOP1 point·2 years ago

Stalled for 22 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 89.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lucia_balogun3 points·2 years ago·edited

Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?

replysharereportpermalink
u/bastian_moreau4 points·2 years ago

rule-change proposals need concrete wording

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →