316
tried phase 2 for 12 weeks. here is what happened.
Right, the triple agonist question again, but with numbers this time. I have 11 data points over 38 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is…
u/renzo_yildiz
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Bochum.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
9,737post karma
4,239comment karma
6submissions
70comments
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on tried phase 2 for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/retatrutide · 15 points · 1 year ago
heart rate and dose escalation need actual measurements, not impressions
comment on tried phase 2 for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/retatrutide · 10 points · 1 year ago
Are you quoting phase 2 or is there phase 3 data now?
comment on tried phase 2 for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/retatrutide · 10 points · 1 year ago
Research use material only, no human-use approval anywhere. Posts must describe what happened, not instruct strangers.
comment on tried phase 2 for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/retatrutide · 31 points · 1 year ago
genuine question, not being difficult: how do you know
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring customs at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/customs · 140 points · 1 year ago
seizure letters: redact everything identifying
comment on three years of biopsy threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/survodutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on [Question] what is — what am I missing here in c/newbiequestions · 26 points · 1 year ago
is this normal week 13 — yes, probably
comment on why does nobody talk about dose escalation in c/retatrutide · 56 points · 1 year ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on the retatrutide question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 298 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
comment on genuine question about week one that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/newbiequestions · 12 points · 1 year ago
What does the wiki say?
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about dose escalation in c/retatrutide · 92 points · 1 year ago
[removed by moderator]
Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about import in c/customs · 1 points · 1 year ago
Week 78 for me and the honest summary is: 24kg down, constipation manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about import in c/customs · 32 points · 1 year ago
research-use documentation is not a magic word
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about import in c/customs · 73 points · 1 year ago
Came off after 69 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
1.4k
what would you tell week-1 you about import
Been lurking in c/cryptopay for about 13 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 39, 2.5mg, and import is the bit I still cannot get a…
646
survodutide vs hepatic fat — genuinely asking which matters more
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: MASH matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have…
comment on beginner vs what is — genuinely asking which matters more in c/newbiequestions · 423 points · 1 year ago
pens versus vials, same molecule, different price
comment on Canada: seizure, and what it actually costs here in c/customs · 4 points · 1 year ago
personal-import allowances differ by country
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify import in c/customs · -1 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.