u/patient_labslip_log
I post rarely and I check my numbers twice.
newer member · joined 24 Mar 2024
Comments — page 4 of 5
comment on [Results] 61 weeks on 0.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/progresspics · 24 points · 1 year ago
What was the batch number and which service?
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for pharmacy posts in c/glp1eu · 72 points · 1 year ago
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
comment on [Question] timeframe — what am I missing here in c/progresspics · 5 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, text-only removes the comparison.
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 1.0mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/vendorvetting · -17 points · 1 year ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on France: survodutide, and what it actually costs here in c/survodutide · 11 points · 1 year ago
do not generalise from tirzepatide
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about appetite return until somebody posts a number in c/tapering · 42 points · 1 year ago
Stalled for 6 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 22.
comment on 22 months in and timeframe is still the thing I get wrong in c/progresspics · 96 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, text-only removes the comparison.
comment on biopsy: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/survodutide · 261 points · 1 year ago
Stalled for 3 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 7.
comment on help me understand research peptides, I have read the wiki twice in c/researchpeptides · 18 points · 1 year ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on Germany: dual agonist, and what it actually costs here in c/survodutide · 72 points · 1 year ago
rodent dual agonist is investigation only
comment on what changed for me between week 50 and week 93 in c/vendorvetting · 30 points · 1 year ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on prescription is the most under-discussed thing in c/coa in c/glp1eu · 24 points · 1 year ago
Came off after 24 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about Janoshik until somebody posts a number in c/vendorvetting · 25 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, SWB took 14 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
comment on [PSA] timeframe is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/progresspics · 31 points · 1 year ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with goal, not with what you concluded.
comment on [PSA] timeframe is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/progresspics · 74 points · 1 year ago
the goal change matters as much as the scale
comment on [Results] 72 weeks, 21kg, and EU was the hard part in c/glp1eu · 0 points · 1 year ago
Today's date for the pricing?
comment on [Results] 72 weeks, 21kg, and EU was the hard part in c/glp1eu · -5 points · 1 year ago
apotheke, receta, pharmacy — twenty-seven different answers
comment on unpopular opinion: Janoshik is massively overrated in c/vendorvetting · 92 points · 1 year ago
HJ order #11, Canada, no drama, receipts inside
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether PeptideMeter is why in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 1 year ago
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
comment on [Discussion] the discontinuation advice in here is 20 years out of date in c/tapering · 1 points · 2 years ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.