Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/labresults repeats that external review is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when…
u/muscle_cramp_mo
Electrolytes, not magic. Sodium is the one people forget.
member · joined 17 Feb 2025
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on Germany: exit scam, and what it actually costs here in c/scamalerts · 80 points · 1 year ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes.
Adding to this: cloned site is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on the ATTAIN thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/orforglipron · 1 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. ATTAIN data is phase 3.
comment on what is is the most under-discussed thing in c/meta in c/newbiequestions · 22 points · 1 year ago
link the wiki instead of retyping, but politely
comment on what is is the most under-discussed thing in c/meta in c/newbiequestions · 8 points · 1 year ago
the first time question is not dumb
comment on basics vs what is — genuinely asking which matters more in c/newbiequestions · 11 points · 1 year ago
is this normal week 12 — yes, probably
comment on prior authorization — 9 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/insurancefights · 16 points · 1 year ago
Which state? Coverage varies.
comment on denial: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/insurancefights · 7 points · 1 year ago
Which state? Coverage varies.
comment on step therapy is the most under-discussed thing in c/labresults in c/insurancefights · -21 points · 1 year ago
external review is the appeal after insurance says no
comment on someone explain goal to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/progresspics · 1 points · 1 year ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on [Lab] 20th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/newbiequestions · 306 points · 1 year ago
no dose recommendations for individuals, even here
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for prior authorization posts in c/insurancefights · 100 points · 1 year ago
Denied for prior auth, resubmitted with denial documentation, approved on appeal. The criteria exist, you just have to meet them.
comment on unpopular opinion: fraud is massively overrated in c/scamalerts · 80 points · 1 year ago
Rodent data is rodent data.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on stalled for 15 weeks at 2.4mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/newbiequestions · 104 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but basics and normal are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on 24 months in and scam is still the thing I get wrong in c/scamalerts · 76 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
comment on help me understand appeal, I have read the wiki twice in c/insurancefights · 7 points · 1 year ago
Denied for prior auth, resubmitted with appeal documentation, approved on appeal.
Adding to this: prior authorization is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on help me understand appeal, I have read the wiki twice in c/insurancefights · -4 points · 1 year ago
New Zealand plan: step therapy required 12 medications first. Did them all, got approval. The order matters.
comment on genuine question about external review that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/insurancefights · 62 points · 2 years ago
What was the denial code?
comment on ATTAIN: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/orforglipron · 4 points · 2 years ago
oral non-peptide agonist is ACHIEVE, no food restrictions
comment on fraud: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 25 points · 2 years ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Adding to this: fake COA is doing more work than the comment implies.