u/laila_almeida
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kumasi.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 5 of 5
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about chargeback until somebody posts a number in c/cryptopay · 57 points · 1 year ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on tried SURPASS for 11 weeks. here is what happened. in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 year ago
Phase 2 TRIUMPH looked amazing. Phase 3 trials are harder. Do not anchor on phase 2 readouts.
comment on tried SURPASS for 11 weeks. here is what happened. in c/trialwatch · 267 points · 1 year ago
STEP 1 readout: 98.9% mean weight loss, absolute numbers matter. Spread around that mean is enormous.
comment on tried SURPASS for 11 weeks. here is what happened. in c/trialwatch · 445 points · 1 year ago
STEP 1 readout: 96.2% mean weight loss, absolute numbers matter. Spread around that mean is enormous.
comment on the confirmations question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/cryptopay · 51 points · 1 year ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about regain until somebody posts a number in c/maintenancephase · 390 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Weight variance is normal at maintenance.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about hazard ratio in c/trialwatch · 121 points · 1 year ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
comment on what changed for me between week 35 and week 84 in c/glp1science · 164 points · 1 year ago
Which paper are you quoting?
comment on receptor: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/glp1science · 52 points · 1 year ago
central appetite signalling is real but people overweight it
comment on reading reship threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/vendorvetting · 5 points · 1 year ago
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
comment on reading reship threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 1 year ago
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
comment on regain vs dose stretching — genuinely asking which matters more in c/maintenancephase · 32 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Discussion] chargeback is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/cryptopay · 21 points · 1 year ago
chargeback rights are crypto: zero
comment on am I the only one who found lowest effective dose harder than the injections in c/maintenancephase · 36 points · 1 year ago
food noise returns but not always immediately
comment on does FLOW actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/trialwatch · 2 points · 1 year ago
dropout handling matters, especially on GI-heavy populations
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for escrow posts in c/cryptopay · 27 points · 1 year ago
The discount was 96.8% but gas ate half of it. Still worth it but the math matters.
comment on small win: goal weight stopped being a problem at week 20 in c/maintenancephase · 185 points · 1 year ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on three years of USDC threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/cryptopay · 35 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on what changed for me between week 50 and week 93 in c/vendorvetting · 6 points · 1 year ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on what changed for me between week 50 and week 93 in c/vendorvetting · 6 points · 1 year ago
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.