233
milestone: what the trials say vs what this community says
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: non-scale victory matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both…
u/kaplan_meier_kim
Watch where the curves separate, not just whether they do.
member · joined 18 Jun 2024
3,489post karma
6,905comment karma
4submissions
93comments
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on PDF metadata — 14 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/scamalerts · 9 points · 1 year ago
sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions
comment on week 11 check-in — 21kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/bpc157 · 4 points · 1 year ago
the BPC-157 literature looks promising but rodent-only
comment on reading sequence threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 1 year ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on reading sequence threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/bpc157 · 119 points · 1 year ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on what is in c/newbiequestions · 35 points · 1 year ago
what is a COA — certificate of analysis, document from the lab
comment on [Vendor] QST order #15 — Spain, 37 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/maintenancephase · 4 points · 1 year ago
state how long you have been at maintenance, week 21 is not maintenance
comment on 22 months in and timeframe is still the thing I get wrong in c/progresspics · 35 points · 1 year ago
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
comment on the Ozempic thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/semaglutide · 17 points · 1 year ago
pens are overpriced, research vials are research grade, same molecule different price
comment on reading first time threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/newbiequestions · 56 points · 1 year ago
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 99.3. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on reading first time threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/newbiequestions · 198 points · 1 year ago
the what is question is not dumb
comment on [Meta] the sequence rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/bpc157 · 0 points · 1 year ago
regulatory status changed in 17 countries, check yours
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 24 weeks to accept.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #17 — France, 33 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/glp1eu · 6 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Pricing is local.
comment on maintenance — my 6-week log, condensed into one table in c/maintenancephase · 93 points · 1 year ago
the lowest dose you can stay on is not the lowest dose that works
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about rodent data in c/bpc157 · 25 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about rodent data in c/bpc157 · 89 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
comment on [Results] 57 weeks, 15kg, and BPC-157 was the hard part in c/bpc157 · 6 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 37 weeks to accept.
comment on lowest effective dose is the most under-discussed thing in c/trialwatch in c/maintenancephase · 6 points · 1 year ago
regain is not a moral failing
comment on beginner vs what is — genuinely asking which matters more in c/newbiequestions · 4 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but week one and basics are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on fraud is the most under-discussed thing in c/reconstitution in c/scamalerts · 56 points · 1 year ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.