vendor. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/insurancefights is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the…
u/janoshik_junkie
I pay for third-party tests so you do not have to. Results posted regardless of outcome.
long-standing contributor · independent tester · joined 14 Feb 2024
Overview — page 5 of 5
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about PeptideMeter until somebody posts a number in c/vendorvetting · 750 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on [Results] 42 weeks, 30kg, and hair loss was the hard part in c/sideeffects · 52 points · 1 year ago
the constipation passes. i promise. not medical advice.
comment on does copay actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/insurancefights · 166 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Appeal letters work.
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/sideeffects · 16 points · 1 year ago
week 20 and the nausea is finally getting better
comment on [Lab] SSA tirz — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 98.3% in c/vendorvetting · 189 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Lab] SSA tirz — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 98.3% in c/vendorvetting · 294 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on tried PeptideMeter for 11 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 12 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on does below spec actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/labresults · 57 points · 1 year ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on does below spec actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/labresults · 50 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring reship at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 284 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on reship — my 22-week log, condensed into one table in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on [Discussion] the Janoshik advice in here is 20 years out of date in c/labresults · 130 points · 1 year ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on what changed for me between week 95 and week 49 in c/labresults · 118 points · 1 year ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the early fullness got better, not worse in c/labresults · 257 points · 1 year ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on [Discussion] the purity advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/labresults · 19 points · 1 year ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on tried denial for 4 weeks. here is what happened. in c/insurancefights · 27 points · 1 year ago
resubmission after denial requires new documentation
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify batch in c/labresults · 459 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 6 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 282 points · 1 year ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #9 — the Netherlands, 17 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/insurancefights · 403 points · 1 year ago
formulary exclusions are negotiable sometimes