u/hamza_serrano
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Nijmegen.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 2 of 3
comment on the vendor question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 10 months ago
the reship rate on QST is actually pretty consistent
comment on [PSA] order records is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/vendorvetting · 15 points · 10 months ago
Yeah, WWB took 15 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
comment on switched from 0.5mg to 0.25mg and the nausea got better, not worse in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 10 months ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 11 months ago
Is that a PeptideMeter result or are you quoting the vendor COA?
comment on someone explain Australia to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/glp1aus · 44 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the 2024 rule change was sudden.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about PeptideMeter until somebody posts a number in c/vendorvetting · 130 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on week 36 check-in — 12kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 36 points · 1 year ago
Order date, product, and result, in that order please?
comment on the order records thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/vendorvetting · 13 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about compounding until somebody posts a number in c/compounding · 19 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. API source transparency matters.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #3 — Germany, 3 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/glp1aus · 49 points · 1 year ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on testing: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/vendorvetting · 349 points · 1 year ago
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on VendorInvestigate in c/vendorvetting · 29 points · 2 years ago
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
comment on Australia — my 7-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1aus · -29 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, the 2024 rule change was sudden.
comment on reading state board threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/compounding · -3 points · 2 years ago
API source questions are on-topic and compounders dodging them is newsworthy
comment on week 66 check-in — 32kg down, nausea manageable, one thing confusing me in c/compounding · 383 points · 2 years ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on reship vs Medutest — genuinely asking which matters more in c/vendorvetting · 64 points · 2 years ago
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for vendor posts in c/vendorvetting · -15 points · 2 years ago
[removed by moderator]
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for vendor posts in c/vendorvetting · 1.6k points · 2 years ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with reship, not with what you concluded.
comment on why does nobody talk about order records in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 2 years ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on someone explain reship to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/vendorvetting · -3 points · 2 years ago
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.