u/halima_boateng
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Brno.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Comments — page 5 of 5
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about related substances until somebody posts a number in c/coa · 785 points · 2 years ago
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
comment on stalled for 21 weeks at 7.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/scamalerts · -18 points · 2 years ago
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
comment on [Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 98.0% and 97.9% in c/coa · 164 points · 2 years ago
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
comment on fraud — 23 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/scamalerts · 45 points · 2 years ago
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
comment on [Results] 16 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/scamalerts · 28 points · 2 years ago
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring Zepbound at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/tirzepatide · 139 points · 2 years ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on [Meta] the batch rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/coa · 1 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on tried meta for 20 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 5 points · 2 years ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on tried meta for 20 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 17 points · 2 years ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on anyone else notice Zepbound kicking in around week 9 in c/tirzepatide · 722 points · 2 years ago
This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 93.7% body weight at 6 weeks.
comment on disclosure: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/meta · 27 points · 2 years ago
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about PDF metadata in c/scamalerts · 214 points · 2 years ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on what changed for me between week 40 and week 89 in c/coa · 271 points · 2 years ago
axis labels included, always
comment on 24 months in and SURPASS is still the thing I get wrong in c/tirzepatide · 19 points · 2 years ago
SURMOUNT data is messier than STEP data but the weight loss is there
comment on [Vendor] QST order #6 — Denmark, 3 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/tirzepatide · 333 points · 2 years ago
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on am I the only one who found disclosure harder than the injections in c/meta · 2 points · 2 years ago
the ranking formula is meta