u/fatima_wojcik
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Mombasa.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 4 of 5
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 6 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 100 points · 1 year ago
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on purity in c/coa · -34 points · 1 year ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify VendorInvestigate in c/vendorvetting · 5 points · 1 year ago
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
comment on unpopular opinion: PeptideMeter is massively overrated in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 1 year ago
QYB order #2, Poland, no drama, receipts inside
comment on test results — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 87 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
comment on small win: Mounjaro stopped being a problem at week 50 in c/tirzepatide · 138 points · 1 year ago
Did the early fullness feel the same as on tirz or genuinely different?
comment on unpopular opinion: Janoshik is massively overrated in c/vendorvetting · 94 points · 1 year ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
comment on the disclosure thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/meta · 7 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Modmail first.
comment on am I the only one who found Mounjaro harder than the injections in c/tirzepatide · -31 points · 2 years ago
Small correction: the trial was 2 weeks, not 29. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [PSA] Mounjaro is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/tirzepatide · 1 points · 2 years ago
the GIP side does different things than the GLP-1 side, that is the point
comment on [Meta] the below spec rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/labresults · 413 points · 2 years ago
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Discussion] rules is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/meta · 6 points · 2 years ago
moderation appeals go through modmail first
comment on [Lab] 8th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/coa · 10 points · 2 years ago
axis labels included, always
comment on [Lab] 8th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/coa · 26 points · 2 years ago
[removed by moderator]
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Lab] 8th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/coa · 1 points · 2 years ago
axis labels included, always
comment on [Lab] 8th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/coa · 136 points · 2 years ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on unpopular opinion: reship is massively overrated in c/vendorvetting · 6 points · 2 years ago
Which service tested it and what did they come back with?
comment on stalled for 2 weeks at 7.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/labresults · 60 points · 2 years ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on stalled for 2 weeks at 7.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/labresults · 158 points · 2 years ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify water content in c/coa · 46 points · 2 years ago
the batch number or it did not happen