u/clara_restrepo
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Konya.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Comments — page 2 of 3
comment on genuine question about batch that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/coa · 21 points · 10 months ago
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
comment on genuine question about scam that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/scamalerts · 22 points · 10 months ago
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
comment on [PSA] COA is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
post the whole document, not the headline number
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring area percent at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 41 points · 1 year ago
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for survodutide posts in c/survodutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
the heart rate signal is real in the data
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for survodutide posts in c/survodutide · 57 points · 1 year ago
comment on [Results] 17 weeks, 5kg, and PDF metadata was the hard part in c/scamalerts · 22 points · 1 year ago
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
comment on stalled for 17 weeks at 7.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 199 points · 1 year ago
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether seizure is why in c/customs · 1 points · 1 year ago
What was in the seizure letter?
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether seizure is why in c/customs · 81 points · 1 year ago
research-use documentation is not a magic word
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about area percent in c/coa · 111 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about import in c/customs · 36 points · 1 year ago
seizure letters: redact everything identifying
comment on certificate of analysis: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/coa · 121 points · 1 year ago
Are you looking at area% or net peptide content? Different numbers.
comment on the Netherlands: seizure, and what it actually costs here in c/customs · 9 points · 1 year ago
customs holds vary by season
comment on [Question] batch — what am I missing here in c/coa · 3 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify hepatic fat in c/survodutide · 66 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, glucagon co-agonism is genuinely different.
comment on tried MASH for 10 weeks. here is what happened. in c/survodutide · 207 points · 1 year ago
comment on area percent — my 20-week log, condensed into one table in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on area percent — my 20-week log, condensed into one table in c/coa · 88 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on switched from 12.5mg to 0.5mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/coa · 13 points · 1 year ago
the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing