u/britta_nakamura
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Mombasa.
member · joined 16 Jul 2025
Comments — page 3 of 3
comment on my fasting insulin moved and I cannot work out whether first time is why in c/newbiequestions · 4 points · 1 year ago
The first time question took me three weeks to understand. Wiki explained it eventually.
comment on what changed for me between week 20 and week 69 in c/newbiequestions · 62 points · 1 year ago
the basics question is not dumb
comment on [Results] 86 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/reconstitution · 12 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 7 weeks, not 34. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Results] 86 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/reconstitution · 82 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. 2mL versus 4mL is the common mistake.
comment on [Results] 86 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/reconstitution · 102 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Meta] the Australia rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/glp1aus · 4 points · 1 year ago
the regulatory PBS is the blocker
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 15mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/reconstitution · 17 points · 1 year ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 15mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/reconstitution · 8 points · 1 year ago
more water means more units for the same dose, which means finer resolution
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 15mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/reconstitution · 78 points · 1 year ago
swirl, do not shake, or you are courting oxidation
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify week one in c/newbiequestions · 0 points · 1 year ago
Disagree.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify concentration in c/reconstitution · 53 points · 2 years ago
Show the arithmetic. Where did the units come from?
comment on [Discussion] the Australia advice in here is 5 years out of date in c/glp1aus · 72 points · 2 years ago
PBS listings change the cost completely
comment on help me understand reconstitution, I have read the wiki twice in c/reconstitution · 2 points · 2 years ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on the dead space question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/reconstitution · -16 points · 2 years ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on mg/mL in c/reconstitution · 107 points · 2 years ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on bacteriostatic water is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/reconstitution · 4 points · 2 years ago
swirl, do not shake, or you are courting oxidation
comment on week 91 check-in — 26kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/reconstitution · 32 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about units until somebody posts a number in c/reconstitution · 92 points · 2 years ago
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.