bacteriostatic water is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects
Right, the bacteriostatic water question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 2 data points over 18 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 72, not week 26. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
What was the vial size and how much bac water?
i am begging people to write down the concentration
[deleted]
dead space is real and the syringe matters
swirl, do not shake, or you are courting oxidation
I am going to push back on this slightly.
This is correct. 2mL versus 5mL is the common mistake.
What was the vial size and how much bac water?
Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.
Are you using a u-100 or u-40 syringe? That changes everything.
the concentration on the vial in marker is the most important step
Are you using a u-100 or u-40 syringe? That changes everything.
- 1This is correct. 2mL versus 5mL is the common mistake.6 comments in this branch · started by u/rina_bergstrom
- 2What was the vial size and how much bac water?5 comments in this branch · started by u/elodie_grimaldi