GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of tried interval stretching for 17 weeks. here is what happened. — 19 comments in the full submission. View in context.
660
c/tapering·submitted 1 year ago by u/yara_lindholm

tried interval stretching for 17 weeks. here is what happened.

Discussionbranch of 6 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: interval stretching matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 20 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 21 people…

Read the full submission and all 19 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/zeynep_weiss30 points·1 year ago

regain on taper is expected, plan for it

replysharereportpermalink
u/naomi_ekstrom9 points·1 year ago

Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_ferreira13 points·1 year ago

STEP 1 and SURMOUNT-4 discontinuation arms show regain

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (3) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/tapering

Stopping on purpose: dose reduction versus interval stretching, what the discontinuation arms of STEP 1 and SURMOUNT-4 actually showed about regain, appetite return timelines, and the people who came off, regained, and went back on without treating it as a failure.

20kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/tapering
c/tapering rules
  1. Cite the discontinuation data rather than guessing at regain rates.
  2. No shaming people who restart.
  3. Say how long you were on and at what dose before you tapered.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/taper_off_tabithau/maintenance_mode_maxu/skip_week_sceptic
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →