[Lab] SGN survo — VendorInvestigate came back 99.0% against a claimed 99.1%
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 7.5mg, week 45, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — biopsy — and tracked it for 8 weeks. Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am…
Week 84 for me and the honest summary is: 30kg down, reflux manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes.
Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
rodent glucagon is investigation only
the GLP-1/glucagon dual is hepatic fat, different from GIP/GLP-1
the MASH indication changes the risk calculus
the MASH indication changes the risk calculus
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 97.9% on the same vial is normal.
Yeah, glucagon co-agonism is genuinely different.
the GLP-1/glucagon dual is hepatic fat, different from GIP/GLP-1