GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of three years of hepatic fat threads, summarised so you do not have to read them — 56 comments in the full submission. View in context.
885
c/survodutide·submitted 5 months ago by u/employer_carveout

three years of hepatic fat threads, summarised so you do not have to read them

Trial Databranch of 9 comments

Been lurking in c/t2dglp1 for about 4 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 44, 2.4mg, and hepatic fat is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 9 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to know is…

Read the full submission and all 56 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 5 months ago
u/tired_ledger_ftw46 points·5 months ago

glucagon co-agonism has a different safety story

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_pires32 points·5 months ago

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with MASH, not with what you concluded.

replysharereportpermalink
u/thermal_mass_tom22 points·5 months ago

the GLP-1/glucagon dual is hepatic fat, different from GIP/GLP-1

replysharereportpermalink
u/employer_carveoutOP12 points·5 months ago

My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mod_cold_roommod · c/coldchain18 points·5 months ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cato_batista15 points·5 months ago

This is correct. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_mbeki10 points·5 months ago

not approved, descriptive posts only

replysharereportpermalink
u/neha_rahimi0 points·5 months ago

not approved, descriptive posts only

Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/isabela_nilsen14 points·5 months ago

Phase 12 or 9?

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/survodutide

Survodutide-specific discussion: glucagon-receptor co-agonism, the hepatic fat and MASH resolution data, and how the side-effect profile compares with GIP-based dual agonism. Small community, high signal.

12kmembers
62submissions
Feb 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/survodutide
c/survodutide rules
  1. Glucagon co-agonism has a distinct safety story. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.
  2. MASH claims need the trial and the biopsy endpoint.
  3. Not approved. Descriptive posts only.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/incretin_ivyu/liver_enzyme_lizu/trialwatch_theo
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →