[Meta] the nausea rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking nausea against triglycerides for 15 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one…
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
The early fullness was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. Week 79 me did not think I would make it to week 30.
This is correct. The muscle cramps is horrible for three weeks and then just ends.
The early fullness was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 73 weeks to accept.
Slight fix: the number was 99.0, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
the food-noise thing stops around week 71 for most people
the food-noise thing stops around week 25 for most people
nausea on day 2 is normal, nausea after week 80 is worth checking
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
the early fullness passes. i promise. not medical advice.
Did the constipation start before or after the dose increase?
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Removed a chain here.
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
ask your actual doctor, not us
Small correction: the trial was 23 weeks, not 13. Does not change your point but people will quote it.