unpopular opinion: nausea is massively overrated
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: hair loss matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 5 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 23 people measuring the same…
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
Same experience. Week 33 and it simply stopped. I know that is not useful information but it is what happened.
This is correct. The early fullness is horrible for three weeks and then just ends.
severe abdominal pain is an urgent-care question, not a forum question
Same experience. Week 80 and it simply stopped. I know that is not useful information but it is what happened.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
severe abdominal pain is an urgent-care question, not a forum question
severe abdominal pain is an urgent-care question, not a forum question
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
nausea on day 2 is normal, nausea after week 61 is worth checking
week 18 and the early fullness is finally getting better
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
Are you on a pen or research vial? The formulation changes the profile.
week 9 and the fatigue is finally getting better