the cloned site question that gets asked weekly, answered properly
I have had 14 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 6 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
Can you post the PeptideMeter result that shows the problem?
Dated screenshot or is this from memory?
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
Can you post the PeptideMeter result that shows the problem?
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 62 weeks to accept.
[removed by moderator]
Not to be pedantic but exit scam and PDF metadata are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
Strongly agree.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.4% on the same vial is normal.
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
- 1Can you post the PeptideMeter result that shows the problem?7 comments in this branch · started by u/foam_head_fred
- 2Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.4 comments in this branch · started by u/ines_ekstrom