how much of what we believe about scam actually comes from group buy threads
Asking properly rather than in a comment on somebody else’s thread: how much of what we believe about scam actually comes from group buy threads. The directory deliberately separates "we have nothing on this name" from "this went badly". Collapsing the two is how boards like this generate false certainty. Nearly paid…
The checks I run before sending money anywhere new, in order, and none of them cost anything.
Domain first, character by character, pasted rather than typed. Then registration age against the claimed trading history. Then a request, in writing, for a batch-specific certificate for the lot they would ship — not the catalogue document.
Then a small order, tested independently. Only after that a real one. This sequence has cost me a handful of small orders and it has never once cost me a large one, which is the whole point.
Now I buy small from anyone new, test it, and only then commit. It has cost me a few small orders and saved me one large one.
What is the exact domain, character for character?
Small fix — the name you are describing is in the wider-market table with almost nothing on file, not in the documented twenty.
[removed by moderator]
The site had a decade of testimonials and a domain registered in March. That was the entire investigation.
Disagree with naming anyone on that basis. One person’s bad month is not a pattern and the sidebar exists for this exact reason.
Careful. What you are describing is a delayed shipment, and this board should not turn that into an accusation without more.
Correcting my own post: the payment date was the 14th, not the 4th. The gap is smaller than I made it sound.
the review page nobody can find on any other site is a warning
I would separate the two claims. The site being newly registered is checkable. The motive you are inferring is not.