GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Meta] proposal — a flair for fraud posts — 38 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.6k
c/scamalerts·submitted 1 year ago by u/ismael_pires

[Meta] proposal — a flair for fraud posts

Confirmedbranch of 5 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: scam matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 11 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 25 people measuring the same…

Read the full submission and all 38 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 1 year ago
u/isabela_nilsen210 points·1 year ago

PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_dahlberg303 points·1 year ago

cloned storefronts use old images, search for those

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]205 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_piresOP133 points·1 year ago

Batch 7 appeared on SSA, KP, and SSA claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.

replysharereportpermalink
u/signe_boateng0 points·1 year ago

This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.