the secretagogue thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down
Right, the TB-500 question again, but with numbers this time. I have 12 data points over 22 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing…
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
focus on identity verification, handling, evidence state
the research peptides literature is thin on humans
the thymosin literature is thin on humans
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.