GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of reconstitution: what the trials say vs what this community says — 38 comments in the full submission. View in context.
8.4k
c/reconstitution·submitted 2 years ago by u/vial_math_vera

reconstitution: what the trials say vs what this community says

Discussionbranch of 5 comments

Right, the concentration question again, but with numbers this time. I have 13 data points over 32 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…

Read the full submission and all 38 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 2 years ago
u/elin_ferrari147 points·2 years ago

Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_kimani49 points·2 years ago

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

replysharereportpermalink
u/katrin_marchetti74 points·2 years ago

bacteriostatic and sterile water are not interchangeable, do not use them that way

replysharereportpermalink
u/vito_beaulieu107 points·2 years ago

i am begging people to write down the concentration

replysharereportpermalink
u/katrin_marchetti83 points·2 years ago

Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/reconstitution

The arithmetic and the technique. Bacteriostatic versus sterile water, reconstitution volume as a concentration choice, converting mg/mL into insulin-syringe units, dead space, swirl-not-shake, stopper coring, and how long a reconstituted vial is actually good for. Math errors get corrected fast and politely.

88kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/reconstitution
c/reconstitution rules
  1. Show your numbers. "How many units?" with no mg and no mL cannot be answered.
  2. Never post a calculation as advice without stating the concentration it assumes.
  3. No sterile-compounding-for-others discussion. Personal handling only.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/bac_water_banditu/vial_math_verau/units_not_mgu/swirl_dont_shake
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →