[Question] units — what am I missing here
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: units matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 4 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 31 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Mechanistically the bit that matters is reconstitution. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
stopper coring on the 4th draw because you keep using the same entry point. rotate.
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.
the concentration on the vial in marker is the most important step
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
stopper coring on the 21th draw because you keep using the same entry point. rotate.
stopper coring on the 21th draw because you keep using the same entry point.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
This is correct. 3mL versus 3mL is the common mistake.
swirl, do not shake, or you are courting oxidation
Did you write the concentration on the vial?
stopper coring on the 7th draw because you keep using the same entry point. rotate.
- 1Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next…6 comments in this branch · started by u/bac_water_bandit
- 2stopper coring on the 21th draw because you keep using the same entry point.…5 comments in this branch · started by u/liv_nkemelu