unpopular opinion: mg/mL is massively overrated
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: reconstitution matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 23 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 25 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
swirl, do not shake, or you are courting oxidation
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
never post a calculation as advice without stating the concentration
more water means more units for the same dose, which means finer resolution
never post a calculation as advice without stating the concentration
more water means more units for the same dose, which means finer resolution
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
30mg vial, 2mL water, concentration is 30/2 — write it on the vial afterwards
- 1Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is…10 comments in this branch · started by u/aleksi_lehtinen