bacteriostatic water vs mg/mL — genuinely asking which matters more
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: bacteriostatic water matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 6 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 21 people…
the concentration on the vial in marker is the most important step
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.
Small correction: the trial was 3 weeks, not 16. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
dead space is real and the syringe matters
bacteriostatic and sterile water are not interchangeable, do not use them that way
swirl, do not shake, or you are courting oxidation