bacteriostatic water vs mg/mL — genuinely asking which matters more
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: bacteriostatic water matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 6 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 21 people…
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.
Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 96.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
bacteriostatic and sterile water are not interchangeable, do not use them that way
This is correct. 2mL versus 21mL is the common mistake.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.
i am begging people to write down the concentration