[Results] 26 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring
Right, the units question again, but with numbers this time. I have 5 data points over 36 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing…
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which
Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.
Cored the stopper on my 19th draw because I kept using the same entry point. Rotate the puncture site.
Did you write the concentration on the vial?