week one is the most under-discussed thing in c/glp1science
I have had 22 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 24 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 97.9% against a claimed 98.0%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Week 7 or week 39?
what is a COA — certificate of analysis, document from the lab
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Mechanistically the bit that matters is what is. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
rudeness is removed faster than bad questions
The beginner question took me three weeks to understand. Wiki explained it eventually.
The beginner question took me three weeks to understand.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 36 weeks to accept.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
Small correction: the trial was 20 weeks, not 16. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
week two nothing happening — yes, that is normal
This is a good question, genuinely.
pens versus vials, same molecule, different price
- 1Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.6 comments in this branch · started by u/ilias_cabrera
- 2Mechanistically the bit that matters is what is. It explains most of the…5 comments in this branch · started by u/ismael_chukwu