12 months in and week one is still the thing I get wrong
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 2.4mg, week 86, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — what is — and tracked it for 2 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
search before post, but also, welcome
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
The first time question took me three weeks to understand. Wiki explained it eventually.
Small correction: the trial was 12 weeks, not 11. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
- 1The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after…4 comments in this branch · started by u/low_appetite_lisa