reading first time threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on what is in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with…
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
Yeah, that is totally normal for week 16.
the first time question is not dumb
the first time question is not dumb
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 82 weeks to accept.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
week two nothing happening — yes, that is normal
the what is question is not dumb
be kind, condescending answers are removed
Strongly agree. No question is dumb here.
is this normal week 17 — yes, probably