[Question] how do you actually verify disclosure
Right, the rules question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 10 data points over 8 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 50, not week 4. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
moderation appeals go through modmail first
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with meta, not with what you concluded.
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in Germany.
The nausea was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.