GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of someone explain moderation to me like I have not read a paper in years — 21 comments in the full submission. View in context.
323
c/meta·submitted 1 year ago by u/ahmed_cardoso

someone explain moderation to me like I have not read a paper in years

Rulesbranch of 8 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: moderation matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 13 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 15 people measuring the…

Read the full submission and all 21 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 year ago
u/rina_ferreira21 points·1 year ago

the periodic argument about moderation standards

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_lundgren14 points·1 year ago

the wiki is the source

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_cardosoOP10 points·1 year ago

How many weeks between the two measurements?

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_wikstrom-23 points·1 year ago

the evidence standards are disclosure

replysharereportpermalink
u/maren_baptista7 points·1 year ago

the periodic argument about disclosure standards

replysharereportpermalink
u/mod_ambulatoryadmin4 points·1 year ago

the periodic argument about moderation standards

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
load more comments (1) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.