help me understand carrier, I have read the wiki twice
Genuinely asking, not being difficult.
Everyone in c/cagrilintide repeats that transit time is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 5 threads of people agreeing with each other.
Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?
I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
Flair changed to match the content.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Yeah, the lane data is more useful than single reports.
This is correct. Variance is the story.
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
packaging quality matters on the 8-hour segments
Yeah, the lane data is more useful than single reports.
the lane table is community-maintained, packaging changes
Australia to Australia: QST with 14 days is the average, variance is 32
Customs held the package for 16 days. No problems, just time. Factor it into expectations.
the lane table is community-maintained, transit time changes
lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, actual transit days
This is correct. Variance is the story.
Origin to destination?
customs clearance often adds 6 days, factor that in
- 1Yeah, the lane data is more useful than single reports.7 comments in this branch · started by u/protein_first_p