the Netherlands: purity, and what it actually costs here
Right, the integration question again, but with numbers this time. I have 6 data points over 32 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
What was the column and what gradient?
the gradient is doing the separation work, not the column alone
integration decision on a shoulder changes your number by half a point on its own
Strongly agree. Largest single impurity tells a different story than total purity.
integration decision on a shoulder changes your number by half a point on its own
co-elution is real and gradient is usually not enough to resolve it
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.