my eGFR moved and I cannot work out whether province is why
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 2.5mg to 1.0mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 5 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have early fullness I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 34 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
name your province, coverage is provincial
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
Maintenance for 11 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
Did anything else change in the same window?
special authorisation is province-specific
I am going to push back on this slightly.
special auth turnaround is province-specific
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
name your province, coverage is provincial
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in Spain.
Strongly agree. Provincial variation is real.
The the food-noise thing was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
- 1I am going to push back on this slightly.7 comments in this branch · started by u/gradient_goblin