9 months in and jurisdiction is still the thing I get wrong
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 5mg to 1.7mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 16 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have muscle cramps I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 32 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Do you have an import allowance in your jurisdiction?
seizure and reship are different outcomes
import countries have different thresholds
This is correct. State your country always.
Stalled for 15 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 91.
This is correct. State your country always.
The fatigue was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
This is correct. State your country always.
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
the 19mg import allowance is Denmark-specific
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
the Spain import rules are specific to Spain
the 14mg import allowance is Denmark-specific
customs holds vary by season
the personal import status depends on what happens at the border
This is correct. State your country always.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
- 1This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three…9 comments in this branch · started by u/stubborn_batchlist_pls