unpopular opinion: seizure is massively overrated
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: seizure matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 2 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 29 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
Mechanistically the bit that matters is jurisdiction. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
personal-import allowances differ by country
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with personal import, not with what you concluded.
always state your country, advice from another jurisdiction can harm you
the Sweden import rules are specific to Sweden
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
- 1personal-import allowances differ by country6 comments in this branch · started by u/oskar_kaufmann