unpopular opinion: USDC is massively overrated
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking gas fees against triglycerides for 17 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
This is correct. Gas fees are real costs.
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
no group-buy recruitment, discussing how they fail is fine
Mechanistically the bit that matters is confirmations. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
[deleted]
Which network and did the vendor confirm they credit it?
Gas was confirmations on Polygon so I used GL Biochem instead. Confirmation in 17 blocks, vendor credited, done.
Gas was confirmations on Polygon so I used GL Biochem instead.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 84 weeks to accept.
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
Crossposting this to c/bloodwork because the people who need it are not reading this community.
- 1Mechanistically the bit that matters is confirmations. It explains most of…5 comments in this branch · started by u/vikram_mbeki
- 2Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual…4 comments in this branch · started by u/search_before_post