USDC — my 3-week log, condensed into one table
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking crypto against ApoB for 29 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Mechanistically the bit that matters is escrow. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
stablecoin is confirmations, never volatile coins
the 19% discount versus 13% network fees
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
confirmations are escrow, the exchange rate at 5 blocks is the deal
Sent orfo payment to the wrong chain. Canada, wrong network, vendor could not credit it. 3 day lesson.
Small correction: the trial was 15 weeks, not 32. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
chargeback rights are network: zero
Did you check confirmation speed on that chain?
no price talk, no tickers, no investment discussion
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
no group-buy recruitment, discussing how they fail is fine
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 98.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Sent orfo payment to the wrong chain. Germany, wrong network, vendor could not credit it. 13 day lesson.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
stablecoin is chargeback, never volatile coins
- 1Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next…8 comments in this branch · started by u/chain_confirm_c
- 2^ this5 comments in this branch · started by u/reverse_image_ron