GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of am I the only one who found rodent data harder than the injections — 58 comments in the full submission. View in context.
963
c/bpc157·submitted 9 months ago by u/nikhil_lindqvist

am I the only one who found rodent data harder than the injections

Labbranch of 8 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: tendon matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 21 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 27 people measuring the same…

Read the full submission and all 58 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 9 months ago
u/ahmed_okafor68 points·9 months ago

Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_szabo43 points·9 months ago

Week 68 for me and the honest summary is: 38kg down, muscle cramps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tired_ledger_ftw33 points·9 months ago

Week 68 for me and the honest summary is: 38kg down, muscle cramps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.

Adding to this: rodent data is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bruno_dumitru26 points·9 months ago

rodent data must be labelled as rodent data

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_bakken22 points·9 months ago

pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_cabrera18 points·9 months ago·edited

pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess

Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/asks_dumb_questions50 points·9 months ago

This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ilias_steiner41 points·9 months ago·edited

pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/bpc157
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/bpc_scepticu/sequence_checkeru/rui_only_ro
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →