GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
1.6k
c/bpc157·posted 1 year ago by u/hugo_bergstrom

rodent data: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1

Sceptic Long Haul ×6 Well Actually ×1

Right, the pentadecapeptide question again, but with numbers this time.

I have 22 data points over 18 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.

The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 3, not week 52. People give up long before the interesting part.

Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.

1,920 up / 271 down88% upvoted41 commentsid v1rvh2 Mar 2025

41 comments

11 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/elin_varga419 points·1 year ago

Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.

replysharereportpermalink
u/throwaway_9182489 points·1 year ago

Week 28 for me and the honest summary is: 9kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (4) →
u/cormac_roos186 points·1 year ago·edited

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.

replysharereportpermalink
u/neha_rahimi-21 points·1 year ago

pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess

replysharereportpermalink
u/nils_ferreira1 point·1 year ago

pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_fonseca121 points·1 year ago

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all.

Adding to this: regulatory is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_mbeki56 points·1 year ago

the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/bpc157
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/bpc_scepticu/sequence_checkeru/rui_only_ro
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →