the sequence question that gets asked weekly, answered properly
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/scamalerts repeats that regulatory is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 15 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true…
the regulatory rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not
the regulatory rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
the BPC-157 literature looks promising but rodent-only
sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence